Welcome, visitor! [ Register | Loginrss  |  tw

Apple reveals the next version of Mac OS X: 10.8 Mountain Lion

| Latest News | February 16, 2012

Mountain Lion

Apple have quietly revealed the next version of Mac OS X 10.8 and it's a Mountain Lion.

Seemingly out of nowhere and with  Keynote announcement, Apple have announced the next version of OS X 10.8. A section on Apple's website details the additions to the new operating system: Messages, Reminders, Notification Centre, Games Centre and Twitter integration. Yep you've guessed it: more features of iOS are coming to the Mac along with further integration of iCloud.

Tim Cook, the CEO of Apple has described iCloud as being part of a long term strategy for Apple, with nearly 100 million users having signed up to the service. The inclusion of dedicated Mac Apps for Reminders, iMessage as well as iOS 5 style notifications prove this intention of Apple to sell more Macs as a bonus to massive iPad and iPhone sales.

Mountain Lion is due to be released in the summer of 2012 just as previous versions have been released to the public. We can expect it to only be available via the Mac App Store just like it's predecessor Lion. Members of the Apple Developer community can download a preview of Mountain Lion here.

Should you uninstall Flash from your Mac?

| Uncategorized | November 14, 2010

Flash: DIY install on your new Air

There is a lot of debate on the web over whether or not Mac users should uninstall Adobe's Flash after Apple stopped installing it on new machines.

The Pro camp highlight the benefits: better battery life, less CPU usage as well as the feeling of warmth for Apple devotees at following Steve Job's wishes.

The Anti camp will highlight the madness of this: rich media on the internet will never work, why cripple yourself, Apple are wrong to make this a political game.

The Anti camp do have a point. We all expect YouTube, the BBC's iPlayer as well as the millions of websites that embed audio within Flash to just work. It's the same reason we advocate the use of Apple products here on UsedMac. On the whole they just work well without hassle.

Right now I would recommend against any normal user uninstalling Adobe Flash from their machine. It will simply break too much of the web that you use.

If you use Safari.

But what if you use Google Chrome? I do and I have uninstalled Flash from OS X.

Why have I done this? Well as we recommend here at UsedMac, I use Google Chrome as my main browser. For some time now Chrome has included it's own Flash plugin that Google have developed with Adobe. It's a Chrome specific version that attempts to improve stability and performance.

So what's the difference? Well I have uninstalled the Flash plugin that was installed on my OS X system in order to force Chrome to use it's own plugin. I rarely (if ever) use Safari, even though I am very fond of its cleanliness and its speed. The lack of Flash support therefore in Safari causes me few issues.

What this does is ensure that when Chrome does need Flash it will only use it's own version of it. This version of Flash, like Chrome itself, will always be up to date and from what I can ascertain from day to day use, performs more reliably and a bit more efficiently.

Plugins loaded in Google Chrome

I've gone a step further than this though. I've installed a Google Chrome extension called 'Flashblock'. Now this may sound like an extreme move usually done by hardened geeks, but it's so I can make the most of improved battery life when Flash isn't being used to load countless ads when browsing.

This is not to say that I am against online advertising. I have decided to use Flashblock so that I can control when or not Flash is being used. Alot of web advertising is still present: you simply get delivered static images and no Flash developed animations. If I want to see them though, I simply have to click on the empty placeholder.

Flashblock: Simply click the Flash Logo to Play

Already I can hear you asking "does this not get infuriatingly difficult?". Not really. When I do visit sites where I want to always see Flash content (i.e. the BBC iPlayer or BBC News site), I can tell Flashblock to always allow Flash on this site. It doesn't take a lot of web browsing to 'whitelist' (i.e. the opposite of black listing) the websites that you are happy to always load flash.

Whitelist: Decide which sites to allow Flash on

So why do this? Well when browsing sites with Flash ads, your CPU could be using as much as 20% of extra power even if your not using Flash for content that you want. This is simply to serve ads. CPU power = Battery consumption. Why not reduce the burden on our battery when it won't prevent you from seeing content you don't need: animated ads.

So you can get the best benefit of removing Flash (more battery life) without losing the ability to watch what you want (The Only Way is Essex on the ITV Player). Plus you can achieve it without alot of hassle.

(Hardcore geek or happy to go without Flash completely? Then Apple commentator and Tech Journalist John Gruber has some tips for life with HTML 5 Video)

Adobe demos a Flash to HTML 5 Conversion Tool

| Latest News | October 30, 2010

Flash: DIY install on your new Air

Flash: DIY install on your new Air

The web is alight with the Flash vs HTML 5 video debate right now: Is it wrong that Apple are trying to force out Flash? Is Flash simply the wrong tool for delivering video over the web through a browser?

All the questions people are hotly debating. They're certainly are benefits to moving away from Flash for smaller devices. This is, after all, Apple's reasoning behind not including it in iOS and even now going as far to not bundle it as part of OS X 10.6 Snow Leopard on the new Mac's that it sells.

Others are calling on Apple as being hugely arrogant and wanting to kill off Flash to benefit its own devices. They cite it as an engineering reason. This I tend to agree with. When my iPhone plays back H.264 video it is able to use its hardware acceleration and play it natively, which in turn provides a better user experience, and crucially for a handheld device: better battery life.

Then again, my friends HTC Desire HD will run Flash and I have successfully managed to get it to play something from the iPlayer. It worked rather well. I wasn't able to judge the effect on battery life however.

So the debate will rage on. One thing that will mantain Flash's status as the big deal for video on the web is the fact that so much of the content available that people want to watch is only in Flash, rather than being available in HTML 5 Video form.

However this may start to change: firstly much of Flash video is delivered in the  H.264 Codec, meaning that the content itself is already ready for HTML 5 Video playback in browsers such as Safari, Chrome and the forthcoming Internet Explorer 9 (Firefox will not natively support H.264 due to licensing fees issues).

But what if there was a tool that could convert your Flash apps, games and video to HTML 5 code?

Well Adobe seem to be developing one.

Are they getting real about Flash's dominance waining? Or shooting themselves in the head? That remains to be seen. Clearly though the tables are turning in the Flash video game.

Notify – An Email Notifier for OS X

| Uncategorized | October 4, 2010

A good mate of mine (who just happens to be a Mac Pro user) tipped me off about this great Email Notifier for OS X:

http://vibealicious.com/apps/notify/

Having tried out many Gmail notifiers (Googles own Notifier for OS X and the Chrome Extension) I've been left lukewarm frankly, so I was sceptical about this one.

Notify for OS X comes from Vibealicious software, comprising of developers Kyle Van Essen and Joel Levin. It works with a variety of Email providers, POP3 and IMAP and looks rather smart, sitting unobtrusively in the Menu bar.

Interestingly my first impressions where of it only displaying new, unread emails to me. Normally I'd be feeling a bit out of the bigger picture, but this look rather clean and neat. It also offers a little preview, so its easy to clear out unwanted junk easily. As you'd hope and expect it will handle multiple accounts, Google Apps accounts, Mobile Me and even Rackspace email. Whatever that is.

Visually I love it's classic OS X gun metal grey look. Even if no one likes the lack of colour in iTunes 10.

Now that we are working more and more in a browser with Web App style tools like Gmail, I like the idea of apps like Notify that offer a 'bridge' from your standard OS to your Web 2.0 email.

You can give the basic version a go for free and they offer a Pro version for $9. Less than the price of bottle of Pinot in Weatherspoons.

Should you buy it though? If you just have one email address, then you could just stick to leaving it open in a browser. Or you could run Mail. If your running multiple accounts though and hate compromising your full browser based email experience, then this could help you one day achieve Zero Inbox Godliness.

Keep OS X secure

| Cool Tips, Latest News | September 25, 2010

Security Icon
OS X 10.6 Snow Leopard delivers another Security Update via Software Update

Not Now: I bet you always click on that. Don't you.

Apple have released another Security Update for OS X 10.6 Snow Leopard. This will roll together recent security issues into 1 update.

Which got me thinking. Fanbois of either Windows or  Mac's are endlessly flaming each other all over the internet over which OS is more secure. Many believe OS X has better security built on its UNIX origins, Windows users claim that Windows has more vulnerabilities purely down to the fact its user base massively dwarfs that of OS X, making it more attractive to hackers.

They do have a point. Not as many of us run OS X compared to Windows. This means you should make the most of the lowered threat level and always keep up to date.

Do you though?

Something dawned on me today in work. Many of our computers in the workplace are tools. We need them to just work and let us get on with our tasks. So when that annoying box pops up asking us to install 'Some Security Updates' I bet we all click 'Not Now'. Or 'Ask me later'. Or 'Go away I need to get this Powerpoint done. You get the point.

I'm guilty of it on Windows in work. I'm even guilty of it on my Mac. It feels different on the Mac though. It doesn't pester you. If the update needs a reboot to install and you hit 'Not Now', it will just stay in the Dock and not bother you. Whereas Windows Update on Windows Vista it will let you put it off for a period of time you decide, eventually bugging you into a restart. Sometimes it will even force you if its a critical update. This is no beef against Vista either; I've seen it on Windows 7 and XP on some corporate environments. Automatic Windows Update has made many PC's far more secure too.

The way these forced updates are implemented though can get rather annoying. I hate people not keeping their systems up to date. It irks me.

I also hate being told when to reboot and being inconvenienced, or worse, loose work.

It never seems to bother me though on OS X. This is another little bit of detail that I believe Apple has got right. If a Restart is needed to Update, it won't force it. Nor will it irritate you 'too' much. You are aware of it though, so you do eventually update. Crucially though your not annoyed and don't hate the OS for it.

Windows has a bad rep for the constant Security fixes, despite them being timely and keeping its users safe. Despite it being unfair, it shows how a little bit of thought on the details of design go a long way to giving your users that 'warm inside' feeling.

So you can even get a warm feeling over the way even the dullest bits of OS X are designed, which keeping you up to date with the latest Software and security fixes.

Paid App of the Week: Fission – the Mac Audio Editor

| Uncategorized | August 19, 2010

Want a simple Audio Editor for OS X? Then here is my fave:

For simple audio editing of speech or cutting out clips you want to download Fission.

It's a Lossless Audio Editor from the brilliant RogueAmoeba.com (I'll be looking at some more of their software in the future so stay tuned).

Fission: Easier than Nuclear Fission. Obviously.

I love Fission. It has all you want from a brilliant Mac application: simple, intuitive and integrated.
It works seamlessly with the rest of OS X using 'Core Audio' meaning it will be able to work with any CODEC that OS X supports.

It's easy to use and best of all when working with digital audio, it will make lossless edits. This helps maintain quality if you're working with an MP3 or M4A file. Normally each time you make a change and save in a compressed format it will do something those of us in audio call 'cascade compression'.

What this means is every time the audio is resaved in say MP3, it will compress it again, so you get a 'cascade' effect of continually degrading the sound quality as more and more information is lost. Once its gone, you cant get it back.

No such worries with Fission though.

It's only $32 US Dollars which at the time of writing comes out at £20.

You can try it completely free first by downloading it here

What’s the best Mac Web Browser? We reckon Chrome

| Cool Tips | August 18, 2010

A gateway to Paris. But not a gateway to the web. That's a Browser

Which web browser should you use on your newly purchased used Mac? There is only one choice for us, but it's a close one: Google Chrome just pips it over Safari.

Let's start controversially. I like Safari. It's fast, it looks great and it is a true OS X application that integrates beautifully with Keychain Access and the appearance of the UI. I should use it daily. However there is a new kid in town. A kid that is just a bit less awkward than Safari. That, er kid, is Google Chrome (that's enough of analogies - Ed)

When I first got my Mac, Google hadn't even announced Chrome, it was just a wobbly rumour. I remember, for some reason, instantly discounting Safari and installing Firefox. Everyone used Firefox back then as well (if you were on Windows) as Internet Explorer is, frankly, woeful. (At work, up until recently, we still had to use IE6 without tabs... It looks like Microsoft are working hard to bring IE9 up to scratch though.)

Firefox was fine, but only fine - not great. For me it just felt too slow. Too slow to load, nowhere near as quick as Safari to render pages and, over time, it would become buggy leading me to delete it and reinstall.

But WORST of all, it just doesn't look like a Mac app. You could still see bits of its Netscape heritage (the first mainstream browser kids, look it up). This I didn't like. So when Chrome arrived on Windows I longed for a Mac version. It took a lot of longing though as it was nearly a year later it arrived. Luckily the developers at Google had took the time to make sure it was a true OS X app from the start, rather than the port that Firefox is.

Google Chrome: Not Evil. Possibly.

You're probably wondering why this integration matters? Well here's one example: OS X has a real trump card over Windows with 'Keychain Access'. This is basically a Login and Password store that is built into the operating system, which applications can use rather than store them themselves. So if you save a Password in Safari, it can be used by Chrome for example without needing to entered again. Very neat.

Extensions

One thing that put some users off Chrome at first was the lack of Extension's like Firefox boasts. These enable you to add functionality to your web browser with the advantage that if you don't want to, you don't have to. So if you want your browser to be lightweight and simple it can be. Or if you want to be able to update your Twitter or change the volume in iTunes from within the browser, you can.

Luckily Google decided to add extensions to Chrome. Have a look at the brilliant Extensions gallery (I recommend the Gmail extension. That is if you use Gmail). So if you want extra functionality like Firefox, you can now get it. Without Firefox. Ouch.

Speed

Google has always wanted Chrome to be all about speed. And it is. On Window's it easily outlicked Internet Explorer. This gap is not so big on the Mac though, as obviously we are blessed with a much better default browser in Safari. It's no surprise then that both Safari and Chrome are built on the same 'chassis' otherwise know as the rendering engine 'Webkit'.

Having milked Webkit for all it can performance wise, Chrome has thought about how we use the browser. It's extremely (surprise surprise) search focused. There is just one box for URL's and search. Now you wouldn't have thought being able to search in the same box as the URL made much of a difference. But it does. It just *feels* so much faster. Even if I think Safari 5 renders a little bit quicker. Since version 5, Safari is a lot better at offering up history in the URL bar when entering the name of a site, however it just wasn't as clever as the Google Omnibox. Just try it. Type in 'Katy Perry' and it will not only offer up the most relevant search results but it will have a guess from your history and pretty much all the time get what you expected. In this case probably the GQ photoshoot. It's magical. A little scary, but too good to care.

Innovation

HTML5. WebM. Synced Bookmarks, Passwords and History. Incognito Mode. Javascript.

Hello ladies.

Yep none of this seems very interesting. Although it all means that Chrome is rapidly developed and regularly updated. Its ability to render the next way in which websites are made 'HTML 5' and do 'Javascript' fast basically means Facebook Chat works a lot better and your Google Docs are easier to manipulate. It's basically the future of the web and Chrome is one of the best ways to experience modern sites. Just try it in IE6 and see what I mean.

This is not to say Firefox or Safari won't: Again Safari is up there with Chrome. The difference is Chrome seems to get these developments first. Google don't hold back, they update regularly. Which means your web experience is always up to date. Unless of course you hate auto updates. It does plently of these. If you do then I'd stick to Firefox. And keep checking for Big Brother through the black out blinds...

Anything rubbish?

We're nothing but fair here at UsedMac. If somethings brilliant we'll say it. If it's not good enough we wont ignore it. So here are my gripes with Chrome.

On OS X the Bookmarks bar still has too big a gap between icons. I've already written about this. It looks unsightly:

MIND THE GAP. MIND THE GAP.

Look at the Windows version. It's fine:

Vista: Johnson's never going to upgrade

You can clearly see how much screen space it wastes that could be filled with more bookmarks. Sort it Google!

It's nearly enough to make you want to go back to Vista! Hohoho.

What else? Well sometimes it will struggle to resolve a site. It's very random and most of the time its fine. I suspect this is to do with a method Google is using to make it even faster. Sadly it hiccups occasionally and you don't even get a webpage. Very annoying. Although I have also seen Safari affected in this way as Apple have recently started to use a similar technique.

The fact is though is that despite these niggles, its still feels moe intuitive to use than its rivals. There is more of a smooth flow to it. It handles tabs brilliantly, I love being able to pin them so your GMail and Facebook so they are easier to find. Crikey it's almost like its becoming an Operating System in its own right......

Download it here. Then tell us what you think. Am I spot on? Or a blinded Google fanbois? Tell me in the comments.

Google: Can You Finish Chrome for OS X Properly Please?

| Uncategorized | August 12, 2010

Wow! It's good, but it's not right

When I first made the move to Mac I kicked off with Firefox until it got more bloated than Rick Waller. Plus it looks about as attractive as Carole Malone.

Therefore I was an early adopter of Google Chrome. And boy its come a long way since its early Beta. So much of Chrome has been intuitively thought out, especially the options for handling tabs. It makes Safari seem clunkly even though as the Mac's native browser, Safari is better integrated with the OS.

Chrome for the Mac is now on a par feature wise with its Windows sibling: synced bookmarks, extensions, Porn Incognito mode and a rapid rendering engine.

However since the completion of the web based Bookmark Manager on OS X they seemed to have cocked up the spacing of the Bookmark Bar icons:

MIND THE GAP: I could get a bendy bus through that

Look at all that wasted space! Look how it ruins my lovely 'Bookmark icons without descriptions idea' stolen from the Chrome OS screenshots! Grrr. Sort it Google.