Welcome, visitor! [ Register | Loginrss  |  tw

iOS 4.3.3 update fixes Location Tracking bug

| Latest News | May 4, 2011

iOS 4.3: it'll be better than our photoshopping

Apple have dropped the latest version of iOS with an update to 4.3.3. This latest iteration of Apple's mobile operating system addresses the location data issues that have seen Apple in hot water over privacy.

So what caused this controversy? Well when you sync your iOS device with iTunes it would copy a database file (called 'consolidated.db') from, say, your iPhone 4 to your computer. This file would contain location data that is crowd sourced from your cell positions as well as the GPS receiver within your device. This was discovered and even an application was written that would display it on a map for you called iPhone Tracker. Given that this data seemed to have been collected since iOS 4 was released, many users found a substantial amount of references to where they had been.

Here's iPhone Tracker in action:

iPhone Tracker plot of consolidated.db

This show's where the UsedMac iPad has travelled since November 2010 when it was updated to iOS 4.2. The bigger the blobs mean more records of being in that location, so as you can see a lot of time has been spent in London Village.

So this update addresses this with these key changes:

  • Reduces the size of the cache - this means that your iPad or iPhone can store less of this data than it could before.
  • No longer backs the cache up to iTunes - you or anybody else wont be able to get the data off your device
  • Deletes the cache entirely when Location Services are turned off - this is just like resetting Safari to remove any personal information. If you turn Location Services off in Settings, then its all wiped

So if your unhappy with the existence of this data or where concerned about Apple 'following' you (even though it seems it was an oversight in iOS 4) then plug into iTunes 10 and get updating.

We've just ran it ourselves. Sadly as ever the full 593.3mb of the Update needs to be downloaded just for this small patch. All seems to be fine though on our iPad.

The update is available for the iPhone 4, iPhone 3GS, iPad 2, iPad and iPod Touch (4th generation).

3 rated as best iPhone network

| Latest News | November 14, 2010

Three SIM Pack: Never thought I'd see one of these again

YouGov have rated 3 as the Number 1 network for iPhone 4 use in the UK.

Clearly maximising their high speed network for data, 3's users are more likely to recommend the network to other friends, according to the polling company.

3 came out as the top network having been rated top in 8 of 15 categories. The YouGov DongleTracker survey polled 4.053 Mobile Broadband users in all. Out of these polled a total of 2,160 used Smartphone's, with 3 coming out as having the 'fastest connection speeds' over rival providers O2, T-Mobile, Orange and Vodafone.

This certainly matches our findings so far over on our SIM Only Blog, we loved 3's speed and 3G coverage so much we reluctantly ordered our PAC code to head to our next network T-Mobile. Our speed tests and real world usage showed 3 in a good light and helped to move on from the perception of it being a third rate network.

Damn You Autocorrect

| Latest News | November 6, 2010

Steve: Can we call him just by his first name? Oh. No. Steve Jobs.

We've just come across this great site that highlights the 'joys' that the iPhone's autocorrect can bring. We've ranted about this before so it's great to see a site tracking it!

My 'favourite' annoyance has been my iPhone thinking I'm writing about 'Reading' rather than reading. Is Steve Jobs a massive fan of M4 commuter towns?!

I bet we've all seen the wrong autocorrect just as we've hit Send and see that progress bar push out the text!

Adobe demos a Flash to HTML 5 Conversion Tool

| Latest News | October 30, 2010

Flash: DIY install on your new Air

Flash: DIY install on your new Air

The web is alight with the Flash vs HTML 5 video debate right now: Is it wrong that Apple are trying to force out Flash? Is Flash simply the wrong tool for delivering video over the web through a browser?

All the questions people are hotly debating. They're certainly are benefits to moving away from Flash for smaller devices. This is, after all, Apple's reasoning behind not including it in iOS and even now going as far to not bundle it as part of OS X 10.6 Snow Leopard on the new Mac's that it sells.

Others are calling on Apple as being hugely arrogant and wanting to kill off Flash to benefit its own devices. They cite it as an engineering reason. This I tend to agree with. When my iPhone plays back H.264 video it is able to use its hardware acceleration and play it natively, which in turn provides a better user experience, and crucially for a handheld device: better battery life.

Then again, my friends HTC Desire HD will run Flash and I have successfully managed to get it to play something from the iPlayer. It worked rather well. I wasn't able to judge the effect on battery life however.

So the debate will rage on. One thing that will mantain Flash's status as the big deal for video on the web is the fact that so much of the content available that people want to watch is only in Flash, rather than being available in HTML 5 Video form.

However this may start to change: firstly much of Flash video is delivered in the  H.264 Codec, meaning that the content itself is already ready for HTML 5 Video playback in browsers such as Safari, Chrome and the forthcoming Internet Explorer 9 (Firefox will not natively support H.264 due to licensing fees issues).

But what if there was a tool that could convert your Flash apps, games and video to HTML 5 code?

Well Adobe seem to be developing one.

Are they getting real about Flash's dominance waining? Or shooting themselves in the head? That remains to be seen. Clearly though the tables are turning in the Flash video game.

Free iPhone tethering with Three

| The UsedMac Blog | September 7, 2010

Three SIM Pack: Never thought I'd see one of these again

The other night I spotted a Tweet that reminded me of my biggest surprise when I moved the trusty iPhone 3G to Three UK:

So what is tethering you ask?

Well, tethering is a very handy way of sharing the internet connection from your iPhone with your computer.

The iPhone can achieve this via either Bluetooth or its trusty USB cable. Your Mac or PC should detect it as a network device as a Modem - which is exactly what it behaves as if your network enables it, albeit without the fun sounds of the 56k dialup you would of had on your MegaPC.

It makes perfect sense really doesn't it? Why pay twice for another 3G dongle when you can use the 3G you've already paid for on your iPhone!

Just one small problem, you'll probably have to pay twice anyway. Take O2 for example. When Apple first announced tethering as part of OS 3.0 it quickly became clear that Networks would need to enable it. On O2 it was going to cost you an extra £15 a month to be able to tether. That's alot of money on top of what where expensive tariffs.

So I have to give Three some credit here. I wondered at first if the tethering option would disappear once they issued a new carrier update, but no, its still there.

I've used it a few times in anger for work as well. Whilst at the NASS Festival I hooked it up to my Mac and got online to email some photos. Impressively I had full 3G, even in a field in the Somerset Showground. (In fact it even connected easily in Vista. You may be wondering why the hell I would of been using Vista on my Macbook. It's because I've Bootcamped it whilst waiting for Adobe Audition for the Mac to arrive, as I have blogged before here on UsedMac).

iPhone SIM Only Review: The Three UK 3G Speed Test

| The UsedMac Blog | September 7, 2010

Speed: No runaway buses here, but actually ADSL like performance

One phone, One Used Mac hack's finger, One Speed Test - It's the N1 Labs Three 3G Test

The format is simple: For each network I am going to run a speed test of its data. Labs conditions. Well, sat at my trusty Ikea table in the converted warehouse that I adorn in Dalston (Even though my flatmate argues its Islington.)

Its just one speed test. One go. I had thought about running several then averaging the difference, but then is that how we use iPhones in real life? No. We just want our photo attachments to send and to check Twitter. We just want it to work first time.

So its Tuesday the 7th September. It's just coming up to half past four. There's a tube strike on. Wifi has been switched OFF.

My fingers poised on the Speedtest.net app......

and

GO!

Speed: No runaway buses here, but actually ADSL like performance

Crikey a good result for Three. Not quite the 7-14mbps that is often touted as theroretically acheivable, but in reality this is a good speed. In fact at my last home in South London we barely managed the same speeds on Sky Broadband (Fulham is hardly a rural ADSL non-spot).

Well done Three!

1 Day to go until iOS4.1!

| Latest News | September 7, 2010

Countdown: Whiteley Twice Nightly syncs his iPad

The countdown is on!

I'm very excited about this update, especially for us Old Skool iPhone 3G users.

Lifehacker has posted a video apparently showing a performance comparison between iOS 4 and iOS 4.1:

http://lifehacker.com/5628991/iphone-3g-speed-test-ios-40-versus-ios-41

Fingers crossed we'll see these improvements! I'll let you know as soon as I've updated my trusty 3G how it runs. I'm looking forward to getting Folders and some of my apps back that have gone iOS 4 only. (I'm looking at you, London Tube Deluxe)

Quick play with a HTC Desire

| Uncategorized | August 24, 2010

An Eclair. Not a mobile OS. Well apart from the last version of Android.

An Eclair. Not a mobile OS. Well apart from the last version of Android.

I managed to get a play with a mate's HTC Desire tonight in the pub. It was running the HTC Sense version of Android 2.1 (Eclair).

So first impressions: Quick, geekier than iPhone. Few nice features. The interface needs polish and lacks intuitiveness though. It also lacks consistency. Different apps can have different menus.

So for me Android is getting there, but it felt a bit scrappy and inconsistent at times.

I couldn't help but feel that it lacked the polish of iOS. It's going to be very interesting to see what it feels like by the time Android hits version 3.

Lets be honest:

They're going to need to get that level of 'fit and finish' if manufacturers like LG are aiming to build 'a better iPad' with Android OS.

So how is Three’s coverage?

| The UsedMac Blog | August 21, 2010

Three SIM Pack: Never thought I'd see one of these again

Three SIM Pack: Never thought I'd see one of these again

In the last blog in this series I was impressed with how solid Three’s network seemed across London. Now, obviously life does exist outside of the M25 so here are my thoughts on how their network stacks up after doing some travelling.

(Three are, after all, running their current advertising campaign in order to wipe their image of having patchy coverage from our memories.)

I’ve mentioned before my previous pain with Three. It was a while ago though, back in 2003 to be precise, although they were a young company building a network from scratch. They had even less 3G coverage back then, meaning that you spent a lot of time falling back on to O2 (they have since changed to Orange as the provider of their ‘fallback’ network for Talk and Text). It seemed they wanted to avoid you ending up O2 as much as possible as back then my phone would try to cling on to Three’s 3G as long as possible before dropping your call and registering to O2′s network. As you can imagine, this made making calls a painful process. More often than not I’d have more O2 signal than Three but I’d be lumbered with barely a bar of unusable 3G.

So, how about 2010? Well I’m pleased to say it’s a lot rarer that I see the iPhone bail on to Orange’s network. I’d guess that 70% of the time I glance at the phone it’s got 3G. So it’ll be on Three’s own network. In London it’s probably closer to 90% most of the time, if not more.

Back to outside the capital: I recently grabbed a train from London up to Birmingham, going via the pleasant (and even better, cheap) Chiltern Railways. Now, this journey is mostly rural, serving smaller towns en route than the West Coast Mainline. Firstly, there were regular patches of no signal at all. This though was the case on both O2 and Three. However, I was impressed with how regular the 3G coverage was. Three are clearly making inroads.

Whilst in Birmingham their 3G was also comparable to Orange (on another iPhone). Call quality was good and data speeds seemed nippy enough with perhaps an edge on what I was previously experiencing with O2. With a damn sight more reliability.

Onwards to the North from Birmingham with a trip to the end of the M6 and, ultimately, Scotland. North Berwick to be precise. It’s a bit like the Brighton of Edinburgh. But a lot less developed. And with more golf.

I expected to be sat on a few bars of Orange’s 2G network on my Three iPhone. Yes this is hardly the Hebrides, but my expectations were still that Three would only perform well in big population areas.

I was in for a surprise though - full genuine Three 3G. All 5 new iPhone bars of it. Exactly the same as when sat in my North London flat.

So far, so impressed. When expectations are so low, clearly the only way is up.

GMail archives rather than deleting on iOS4

| Uncategorized | August 19, 2010

Archive Messages

Here's how to stop it

I've noticed an interesting change since iOS4  when using Gmail through Mail.

Rather than being able to swipe to delete a message it now by default offers to Archive it instead.

This is an interesting move by Google. When Gmail first appeared they made it as tricky as possible to delete your mail items in order to encourage you to keep everything. After 'privacy' concerns they relaxed this somewhat and gave the 'Trash' button equal prominence.

So why the move back on iOS4 Mail now? Are they simply taking advantage of new functionality? I suspect so.

Either way it's annoying. Who wants to archive junk in the pursuit of Inbox Zero?

You can revert back to Swipe to Delete in the setting for 'Mail, Contacts, Calendars'. Tap on the relevant account and then simply swipe 'Archive Messages' to Off

Has this annoyed you too? Let us know.

Page 1 of 3123