Welcome, visitor! [ Register | Loginrss  |  tw

Easily get a draft email back in iOS

| Cool Tips, The UsedMac Blog | February 22, 2012

iOS 5 Logo

The iOS Mail App is a great way to write, read and delete your emails but it can be a pain when dealing with drafts. Not only is it not obvious how to save a draft quickly it's also a pain to get back to it without navigating back through your Inbox's folder structure.

Well that's what we thought before we stumbled across this tip.

It seems all you need to do is hold down on the Compose button rather than just tapping it as if your composing a new email. Mail will then pop up your most recent draft. (No we had no idea either). Once you do it it makes complete sense, just like holding down on the Back button of a web browser in order to see your browsing history. It's a wonder that Apple don't publicise these little short cuts more.

What’s the worse time to buy an Android? Any is the answer

| The UsedMac Blog | January 16, 2011

The Google Android Robot

Now it's not like us to have a dig at Android here at UsedMac (Pardon? Ed). Well, ok, sometimes. We are though fair and impartial about our views on all smartphone devices. If the iPhone is being a bit rubbish at something (cough: iOS 4.0 on older iPhone 3G's), we'll say it. If an Android device is way ahead, we'll also give it a mention. In fact if you want better Google Maps and to be able to create your own wireless hotspot at the moment, then Android 2.2 is the way to go.

If there's one weakness of Android currently though, it's the way in which handset manufacturers control the update process. Despite all the talk of Android being 'open' and Apple's iOS being a 'closed' platform, Apple do have a very consistent and clear upgrade route. For instance, if you buy a new iPhone 4, you will pretty much know that by this summer, Apple will announce a successor. In fact Apple's release cycles are becoming aligned with big fashion brands: each product is overhauled and updated annually. Pretty apt given their desirability.

Got an older iPhone? Well with the exception of the original iPhone you can still update for free to the latest version of iOS, even if some older models wont get all the features. Apple make this clear though and you can do it yourself for free.

What about on Android though? It's not so easy. So many devices from different mobile phone manufacturers, all running slightly different versions of Android. So you're at the mercy of, say, Sony Ericcson deciding to update to Android 2.2 if your own an Xperia X10. Mercy it is too, because increasingly they aren't bothering.

So we love this little graphic from DesignDare. It's spot on:

UsedMac ponders the Mac App Store

| Latest News, The UsedMac Blog | November 2, 2010

Coming to a Mac near you

Coming to a Mac near you

So the big stand out announcement of Back to the Mac was the new Mac App Store. It's less than 90 days (and counting) away from us now, so what can we expect from it?

Will Microsoft and Adobe be on it?

With Apple taking a 30% cut of the sale revenue, I initially would very much doubt it. Adobe and Apple are hardly best buddies either right now. Plus the Mac App Store is subject to the same stringent rules as its iOS equivalent. Then again, Adobe have made iPad apps, Microsoft have made iPhone apps. There is the other argument that they don't need to be. People who want Office for Mac or Adobe Elements will always seek it out and install them normally. Perhaps it doesn't really matter, but it will be fascinating to see how it pans out.

What's in it for small developers?

Awareness: Suddenly the App Store helps do their marketing for them. We already know from the iOS App Store that the viral effect of User Reviews - coupled with the simple show window that’s easy for users to navigate - has encouraged people to search out Apps and Games that they think they need.

The payment barriers are gone as well: If you fancied a punt before on say a £10 FTP app, you had to get your debit card out and fill out a web form. The iTunes Store (along with the likes of Amazon) has made it easier than ever to buy things by storing our Debit Card details. One Click and boom! You've got Angry Birds HD.

Is Apple first?

Well in terms of iOS: yes. However on the Desktop you could argue that Ubuntu got there first. Installing programmes in Linux has traditionally been more painful than a dislocated shoulder, however in Ubuntu you have been able to search it's 'Software Centre' since 2009 in order to directly download and install applications. In fact the goal of the Ubuntu development team in this area included encouraging other software makers to list their programmes within the Software Centre.

Is it the end of OS X?

Possibly. Once it is as easy to install Apps and Games on your Mac as it is on the iPhone and iPad (if my parents can do it, anyone can), why wouldn't people use the App Store? Simplicity always wins and if you don't need to use an Installer or deal with downloading a ZIP file, which you then have to copy into the Applications folder, then make sure you eject the DMG properly. Now I'm happy with this as I am a geek, but for the normal consumer that may be considering a Mac as they love they're iPad? They will lap it up. This is certainly the start of the iOS approach heading to the Mac not only with the features muted in 10.7 Lion, but also by making it as easy as possible for users to install, buy and always have the latest up to date version of the programmes that they want.

Why should I use it?

Well you clearly don't have to but why wouldn't you? It is likely to showcase lots of free apps that you would of been unlikely to have stumbled across without a recommendation. It could well bring some of the games titles that exist in iOS to the Mac although they will have the challenge of porting to hardware without Touch screen or an accelerometer.

The biggest advantage of running Apps from the Mac App Store will be you longer having to worry about staying up to date. All updates to Apps will be delivered via the App Store. This means developers don't have to implement their own systems. They'll also be able to piggyback on Apple's Crash Reporting tools. Logic would dictate that this will only improve the quality of code.

Why shouldn't I use it?

From what we know so far, some applications just simply wont get in the store given the approval process. Fans of bleeding edge builds and early 'Betas' (i.e. programmes that aren't completely finished, but usable) won't get these in the Mac App Store. You'll have to get your Firefox 4 Beta from Mozilla and install it yourself. The same goes for Free Trial and Demo software. Apple won't allow these 'try before you buys' in.

So is it a good or bad thing?

There is a lot of debate on the web and Apple podcasts about whether this is another step towards Apple controlling the entire experience or if it simply carries on the Apple ethos of making easy products for consumers.

In the near time, we think it’s all positive: you'll have an easy way to be showcased, then purchase, Apps onto your Mac. Initially I expect the quality of Apps to be high - so lets enjoy it before the Fart apps turn up.

Longer term is less clear. It may well push prices down which developers may not be happy about - unless of course they are selling a higher volume of Applications.

Even more extreme is that we could see OS X morph into iOS with the Mac App Store being the only way to get Apps into your MacBook Air. Geeks will hate this. I should know, I am one. My parents and colleagues that just want 'things to work' may well embrace it.

Google to make another iPhone ‘Killer’

| Latest News | October 31, 2010

HTC Desire
HTC Desire

HTC Desire: Best iPhone alternative, so far

Interesting bit of speculation over on The Register concerning Google and Samsung. They are said to be developing a 'Nexus 2' together, to follow up the Nexus One handset.

This time though the talk is that the phone will be made by Samsung and not HTC, who developed the Nexus One as well as the early Android handset, the G1.

Unlike the Nexus One though, Google is unlikely to sell this directly from their marketplace. This experiment was deemed a bit of failure, so I suspect it will never get beyond Beta. Just like Google Wave.

The report states that Samsung will work on the hardware, with Google looking after all the software. For me this is a good thing for Android. One thing that would put me off an Android against an iPhone is the inconsistency in the user interface. If I buy a HTC Desire, it will use HTC's elements of UI design, just as if I was to buy a Sony Ericsson. At least with the iPhone it will always be consisted. The only time an Android handset has appealed to me though was with the Nexus One. I liked the idea of this running a 'pure' version of Android, so we could see exactly what the OS is like on its own.

Version 3 of Android - Gingerbread (Google have traditionally named their versions after cakes and deserts, all good fun) is expected to be another big leap forward for the OS, particularly in the UI stakes.

Could it be about to get iOS sexy?

Adobe demos a Flash to HTML 5 Conversion Tool

| Latest News | October 30, 2010

Flash: DIY install on your new Air

Flash: DIY install on your new Air

The web is alight with the Flash vs HTML 5 video debate right now: Is it wrong that Apple are trying to force out Flash? Is Flash simply the wrong tool for delivering video over the web through a browser?

All the questions people are hotly debating. They're certainly are benefits to moving away from Flash for smaller devices. This is, after all, Apple's reasoning behind not including it in iOS and even now going as far to not bundle it as part of OS X 10.6 Snow Leopard on the new Mac's that it sells.

Others are calling on Apple as being hugely arrogant and wanting to kill off Flash to benefit its own devices. They cite it as an engineering reason. This I tend to agree with. When my iPhone plays back H.264 video it is able to use its hardware acceleration and play it natively, which in turn provides a better user experience, and crucially for a handheld device: better battery life.

Then again, my friends HTC Desire HD will run Flash and I have successfully managed to get it to play something from the iPlayer. It worked rather well. I wasn't able to judge the effect on battery life however.

So the debate will rage on. One thing that will mantain Flash's status as the big deal for video on the web is the fact that so much of the content available that people want to watch is only in Flash, rather than being available in HTML 5 Video form.

However this may start to change: firstly much of Flash video is delivered in the  H.264 Codec, meaning that the content itself is already ready for HTML 5 Video playback in browsers such as Safari, Chrome and the forthcoming Internet Explorer 9 (Firefox will not natively support H.264 due to licensing fees issues).

But what if there was a tool that could convert your Flash apps, games and video to HTML 5 code?

Well Adobe seem to be developing one.

Are they getting real about Flash's dominance waining? Or shooting themselves in the head? That remains to be seen. Clearly though the tables are turning in the Flash video game.

iOS4 Spelling (Spalling?) Autocorrect

| The UsedMac Blog | August 16, 2010

...is an odd beast.

I do wonder how they decide what gets into its dictionary. It offers up 'iPhone' in place of iphone (Brandtastic!) but oddly if you put in 'ios' it wont offer up 'iOS'.

Most annoying of all is 'reading'. How many times now when texting someone the word 'reading' is it going to think I'm telling them about 'Reading'? I mean who wants to tell anyone about Reading? Does Steve love M4 corridor commuter towns?

Oh and now that spelling errors gets a wavey red underline, has anyone else actually managed to use it without lobbing their iPhone into the nearest canal?

I'm off for a canal cycle ride. Hopefully my iPhone 3G doesn't end up in it.

Let me know what random suggestions your iPhone or iPad has offered up in the comments!