Welcome, visitor! [ Register | Loginrss  |  tw

Adobe demos a Flash to HTML 5 Conversion Tool

| Latest News | October 30, 2010

Flash: DIY install on your new Air

Flash: DIY install on your new Air

The web is alight with the Flash vs HTML 5 video debate right now: Is it wrong that Apple are trying to force out Flash? Is Flash simply the wrong tool for delivering video over the web through a browser?

All the questions people are hotly debating. They're certainly are benefits to moving away from Flash for smaller devices. This is, after all, Apple's reasoning behind not including it in iOS and even now going as far to not bundle it as part of OS X 10.6 Snow Leopard on the new Mac's that it sells.

Others are calling on Apple as being hugely arrogant and wanting to kill off Flash to benefit its own devices. They cite it as an engineering reason. This I tend to agree with. When my iPhone plays back H.264 video it is able to use its hardware acceleration and play it natively, which in turn provides a better user experience, and crucially for a handheld device: better battery life.

Then again, my friends HTC Desire HD will run Flash and I have successfully managed to get it to play something from the iPlayer. It worked rather well. I wasn't able to judge the effect on battery life however.

So the debate will rage on. One thing that will mantain Flash's status as the big deal for video on the web is the fact that so much of the content available that people want to watch is only in Flash, rather than being available in HTML 5 Video form.

However this may start to change: firstly much of Flash video is delivered in the  H.264 Codec, meaning that the content itself is already ready for HTML 5 Video playback in browsers such as Safari, Chrome and the forthcoming Internet Explorer 9 (Firefox will not natively support H.264 due to licensing fees issues).

But what if there was a tool that could convert your Flash apps, games and video to HTML 5 code?

Well Adobe seem to be developing one.

Are they getting real about Flash's dominance waining? Or shooting themselves in the head? That remains to be seen. Clearly though the tables are turning in the Flash video game.

Chrome 6 arrives on the Mac

| Latest News | September 4, 2010

Google Chrome

Chrome 6 on the Mac is here. More changes than I expected! AND they've sorted out the Bookmark buttons:

This makes me a very happy bunny. In fact this feels like the mostsignificant update on the Mac since the first Beta arrived.

Here's what's new

  • The interface has been further simplified, the Page and Tool buttons have been merged into one with simplified options. The Go button has gone altogether. (I'm amazed its taken this long, who even uses them?)
  • Form Autofill is now native - no extension required
  • Syncing: Now it's not just Bookmarks, you can also sync Extensions, Autofill and Passwords across all the PC's you have Chrome 6 installed on, whether Mac, PC or Linux
  • Simplified URL box - look, HTTP:// has gone hasn't it?
  • Even faster Javascript according to Google (although they always say this, I'm struggling to notice the advancements in the real world now though)
  • Support for WebM videos. I'll be writing about the online video war soon, but in brief this is Google's new royalty free web video standard for HTML5 Video. HTML5 video basically allows browsers to render video without flash if they support the CODEC. You can play with the Youtube WebM beta here. (Incidentally Chrome 6 also comes bundled with its own Flash plugin, meaning you don't need to download it separately.)
  • Again, and finally: they've fixed my biggest annoyance. Yey:

    Chrome 6 has landed

    Chrome 6: It actually looks like a Chrome kitchen as well now

So all in all, not a bad effort for a Browser thats only 2 years old. You didn't misread that!

What’s the best Mac Web Browser? We reckon Chrome

| Cool Tips | August 18, 2010

A gateway to Paris. But not a gateway to the web. That's a Browser

Which web browser should you use on your newly purchased used Mac? There is only one choice for us, but it's a close one: Google Chrome just pips it over Safari.

Let's start controversially. I like Safari. It's fast, it looks great and it is a true OS X application that integrates beautifully with Keychain Access and the appearance of the UI. I should use it daily. However there is a new kid in town. A kid that is just a bit less awkward than Safari. That, er kid, is Google Chrome (that's enough of analogies - Ed)

When I first got my Mac, Google hadn't even announced Chrome, it was just a wobbly rumour. I remember, for some reason, instantly discounting Safari and installing Firefox. Everyone used Firefox back then as well (if you were on Windows) as Internet Explorer is, frankly, woeful. (At work, up until recently, we still had to use IE6 without tabs... It looks like Microsoft are working hard to bring IE9 up to scratch though.)

Firefox was fine, but only fine - not great. For me it just felt too slow. Too slow to load, nowhere near as quick as Safari to render pages and, over time, it would become buggy leading me to delete it and reinstall.

But WORST of all, it just doesn't look like a Mac app. You could still see bits of its Netscape heritage (the first mainstream browser kids, look it up). This I didn't like. So when Chrome arrived on Windows I longed for a Mac version. It took a lot of longing though as it was nearly a year later it arrived. Luckily the developers at Google had took the time to make sure it was a true OS X app from the start, rather than the port that Firefox is.

Google Chrome: Not Evil. Possibly.

You're probably wondering why this integration matters? Well here's one example: OS X has a real trump card over Windows with 'Keychain Access'. This is basically a Login and Password store that is built into the operating system, which applications can use rather than store them themselves. So if you save a Password in Safari, it can be used by Chrome for example without needing to entered again. Very neat.

Extensions

One thing that put some users off Chrome at first was the lack of Extension's like Firefox boasts. These enable you to add functionality to your web browser with the advantage that if you don't want to, you don't have to. So if you want your browser to be lightweight and simple it can be. Or if you want to be able to update your Twitter or change the volume in iTunes from within the browser, you can.

Luckily Google decided to add extensions to Chrome. Have a look at the brilliant Extensions gallery (I recommend the Gmail extension. That is if you use Gmail). So if you want extra functionality like Firefox, you can now get it. Without Firefox. Ouch.

Speed

Google has always wanted Chrome to be all about speed. And it is. On Window's it easily outlicked Internet Explorer. This gap is not so big on the Mac though, as obviously we are blessed with a much better default browser in Safari. It's no surprise then that both Safari and Chrome are built on the same 'chassis' otherwise know as the rendering engine 'Webkit'.

Having milked Webkit for all it can performance wise, Chrome has thought about how we use the browser. It's extremely (surprise surprise) search focused. There is just one box for URL's and search. Now you wouldn't have thought being able to search in the same box as the URL made much of a difference. But it does. It just *feels* so much faster. Even if I think Safari 5 renders a little bit quicker. Since version 5, Safari is a lot better at offering up history in the URL bar when entering the name of a site, however it just wasn't as clever as the Google Omnibox. Just try it. Type in 'Katy Perry' and it will not only offer up the most relevant search results but it will have a guess from your history and pretty much all the time get what you expected. In this case probably the GQ photoshoot. It's magical. A little scary, but too good to care.

Innovation

HTML5. WebM. Synced Bookmarks, Passwords and History. Incognito Mode. Javascript.

Hello ladies.

Yep none of this seems very interesting. Although it all means that Chrome is rapidly developed and regularly updated. Its ability to render the next way in which websites are made 'HTML 5' and do 'Javascript' fast basically means Facebook Chat works a lot better and your Google Docs are easier to manipulate. It's basically the future of the web and Chrome is one of the best ways to experience modern sites. Just try it in IE6 and see what I mean.

This is not to say Firefox or Safari won't: Again Safari is up there with Chrome. The difference is Chrome seems to get these developments first. Google don't hold back, they update regularly. Which means your web experience is always up to date. Unless of course you hate auto updates. It does plently of these. If you do then I'd stick to Firefox. And keep checking for Big Brother through the black out blinds...

Anything rubbish?

We're nothing but fair here at UsedMac. If somethings brilliant we'll say it. If it's not good enough we wont ignore it. So here are my gripes with Chrome.

On OS X the Bookmarks bar still has too big a gap between icons. I've already written about this. It looks unsightly:

MIND THE GAP. MIND THE GAP.

Look at the Windows version. It's fine:

Vista: Johnson's never going to upgrade

You can clearly see how much screen space it wastes that could be filled with more bookmarks. Sort it Google!

It's nearly enough to make you want to go back to Vista! Hohoho.

What else? Well sometimes it will struggle to resolve a site. It's very random and most of the time its fine. I suspect this is to do with a method Google is using to make it even faster. Sadly it hiccups occasionally and you don't even get a webpage. Very annoying. Although I have also seen Safari affected in this way as Apple have recently started to use a similar technique.

The fact is though is that despite these niggles, its still feels moe intuitive to use than its rivals. There is more of a smooth flow to it. It handles tabs brilliantly, I love being able to pin them so your GMail and Facebook so they are easier to find. Crikey it's almost like its becoming an Operating System in its own right......

Download it here. Then tell us what you think. Am I spot on? Or a blinded Google fanbois? Tell me in the comments.

Google: Can You Finish Chrome for OS X Properly Please?

| Uncategorized | August 12, 2010

Wow! It's good, but it's not right

When I first made the move to Mac I kicked off with Firefox until it got more bloated than Rick Waller. Plus it looks about as attractive as Carole Malone.

Therefore I was an early adopter of Google Chrome. And boy its come a long way since its early Beta. So much of Chrome has been intuitively thought out, especially the options for handling tabs. It makes Safari seem clunkly even though as the Mac's native browser, Safari is better integrated with the OS.

Chrome for the Mac is now on a par feature wise with its Windows sibling: synced bookmarks, extensions, Porn Incognito mode and a rapid rendering engine.

However since the completion of the web based Bookmark Manager on OS X they seemed to have cocked up the spacing of the Bookmark Bar icons:

MIND THE GAP: I could get a bendy bus through that

Look at all that wasted space! Look how it ruins my lovely 'Bookmark icons without descriptions idea' stolen from the Chrome OS screenshots! Grrr. Sort it Google.